As reported by Lucy Sherriff at The Register and elsewhere, a couple of quite detailed “scientific” papers have been released, stating that bacteria are responsible for global warming, and not mankind at all.

While this might seem great for those who understand that the global warming hoax is in reality a promotion of genocidal policies for the 3rd world, combined with a whole new financial bubble for the 1st world, it turns out that these papers are fake. The intent is to fool people into discrediting themselves.

Lucy Sherriff thinks this is “nifty.” Not the word I would use, and in the end, the whole exercise has not been very well executed, as neither paper was released by a university that actually has a climatology department.

The question is, who’s behind it all? It’s another demonstration that the global warming cult is agenda driven, it seems to me. Although I am not suggesting Al Gore is personally behind this, he does represent a couple of obvious agendas:

• Al Gore, along with many of his collaborators, is a racist. He got into politics in the first place with a seat in Congress as a reward for his part in the frame up of Morris Haddox, an African American political leader, who was trying to stop Nashville police from destroying the community by allowing unhindered narcotics trafficking and prostitution. This frame up was in turn part of the FBI’s Operation Fruehmenschen (German for “early” or “primitive men”), in which black politicans and officials were illegally targeted and smeared, from the late 50’s until the mid 1970’s. Al’s racism came to public notice in 1999, when he condemned millions of Africans to a lingering death by denying them access to generic Aids drugs. So agenda number one for pushing the global warming fraud is racial - preventing 3rd world, and particularly African, countries from developing.
• Gore, along with many of his collaborators, benefits personally, via his financial interests. His hedge fund companies specialise in so-called “carbon trading”, another name for scamming millions of dollars from unsuspecting businesses in what can only be described as a private tax.

So when someone attempts to sucker right minded people into discrediting themselves, I wouldn’t use the word “nifty.” Nor would I hail them, as Ms Sherriff does. I’d ask why these people think that carbon trading and research into “carbon sinks” is better than nuclear power, hydrogen fueled cars, and research into nuclear fusion?

This entry was posted on Saturday, November 10th, 2007 at 2:12 pm and is filed under Global Warming. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.